nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unix Timestamp
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:18:41 -0500
Once upon a time, Greg A. Woods <woods () weird com> said:
PERL!?!?!? What the heck's the matter with "date"!?!?!?!? 0.0 :-) $ date -r 1003723200 Mon Oct 22 00:00:00 EDT 2001
On Solaris 7: $ date -r 1003723200 date: illegal option -- r usage: date [-u] mmddHHMM[[cc]yy][.SS] date [-u] [+format] date -a [-]sss[.fff] On Digital Unix 4.0F: $ date -r 1003723200 date: illegal option -- r Usage: date [-u] [+field descriptors] On Red Hat Linux 7.1: $ date -r 1003723200 date: 1003723200: No such file or directory But perl works on all three. :-) -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: Unix Timestamp Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Unix Timestamp Brandon Handeland (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Pat Myrto (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Barry Shein (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Greg A. Woods (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Chrisy Luke (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Chris Adams (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Greg A. Woods (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Michael L. Barrow (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Henry Yen (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Owen DeLong (Oct 23)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Pat Myrto (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Nathan Stratton (Oct 22)
- Re: Unix Timestamp Michael L. Barrow (Oct 22)