nanog mailing list archives
Fwd: Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken
From: Rodney Thayer <rodney () tillerman to>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:41:19 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 12:24:17AM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote: > Don't waste your time. We had PGP auth working for the last 6 years. It > will slow down any change you want to make by 3-5 days. Around 30% will get > rejected for no reason whatsoever, and much more fun stuff. I find these comments interesting. I have been using PGP auth for a number of years and found it to work just fine.
From the PGP implementor community, we've seen reports that the NetSol use of PGP has had issues in the past, things being garbled or lost, other sorts of things. The implication was that there were issues with the PGP implementation they were using. I've heard multiple stories of people having less-than-sound customer service experiences with this mechanism.
Current thread:
- NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Joe Rhett (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Peter Galbavy (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Leo Bicknell (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken J.D. Falk (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Matt Zimmerman (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Adam McKenna (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken J.D. Falk (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken John Hall (Oct 24)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Matt Zimmerman (Oct 22)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Len Sassaman (Oct 23)
- Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken David Shaw (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: Re: NetSol's PGP auth ... and the road not taken Rodney Thayer (Oct 22)