nanog mailing list archives
Re: whois syntax
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:45:54 -0400
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:56:34AM -0400, Robert Boyle wrote:
There is no standard specified in the RFC for output, just for query language.
Is RFC954 a standard in any real sense? Seems to me that the RFC2026 designation for that document would be "Historic", although RFC954 is old enough that it is not labelled with a maturity level. The only consistent similarities I can find between all the deployed production *IR/IRR/registry/registrar whois servers is (a) that they all let you look stuff up, and (b) they all listen on 43/tcp. Joe
Current thread:
- whois syntax Andrew Brown (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax Matt Martini (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax bmanning (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax Robert Boyle (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax Joe Abley (Oct 19)
- Re: whois syntax Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Joe Abley (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Vadim Antonov (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Greg A. Woods (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax bmanning (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Vadim Antonov (Oct 21)
- Re: whois syntax Joe Abley (Oct 19)
- Re: whois syntax Matt Martini (Oct 18)