nanog mailing list archives
RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
From: "Borchers, Mark" <mborchers () splitrock net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:20:49 -0600
This is all that shows up at http://www.nic.mil/: route: 132.0.0.0/10 descr: DISA, DSAC P. O. Box 1605 Columbus OH 43216-5002, USA origin: AS568 member-of: RS-COMM_US_FED mnt-by: MAINT-AS568 changed: nsfnet-admin () merit edu 19940819 source: RADB
-----Original Message----- From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bicknell () ufp org] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:02 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases 132.0.0.0/10 is floating around: route-views.oregon-ix.net>show ip bgp 132.0.0.0/10 BGP routing table entry for 132.0.0.0/10, version 12484641 Paths: (43 available, best #41) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 64.166.72.140 4513 13646 5696 568, (aggregated by 568 198.26.128.1) 195.66.224.82 from 195.66.224.82 (209.10.12.222) Origin IGP, metric 7602, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate [snip, route-views has more than a page of entries for it] However, it doesn't apprar to be registered: % whois -h whois.arin.net 132.0.0.0 No match for "132.0.0.0". 568 regisitered to disa.mil, and a number of longer prefixes inside the /10 are registered to .mil addresses: % whois -h whois.arin.net 132.15.0.0 Kadena Air Base (NET-KADENA-NET) Bldg 792, Kadena AB JA APO, AP 96368-5149 US The question is, do they legitimately own the whole /10? If so, why isn't it marked in the databases? -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Current thread:
- 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Leo Bicknell (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Rafi Sadowsky (Nov 27)
- RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Matt Levine (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Leo Bicknell (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Philip Smith (Nov 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Borchers, Mark (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Philip Smith (Nov 28)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Rafi Sadowsky (Nov 27)