nanog mailing list archives
Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 26 Nov 2001 10:53:38 -0800
My first thought in response to this is the vendor's support costs - wouldn't shipping more reliable images bring down those costs signficantly? Or is it just that the extra revenue opportunities gained by adding $WHIZBANG_FEATURE_DU_JOUR outweigh those potential support savings?
When presented with an either-or decision like "Doing <X> will make $M but doing <NOT-X> will save $S" then in most public companies $S would have to be more than $M x 2 before <X> will stop happening. In this case $S is not even a notable fraction of $M so it's not even worth discussing. Somebody here said router design was a political process. I disagree. But networks are complex systems owing their existence (and their nature) to an ever shifting matrix of politics, economics, and physics. And, Heraclitus' maxim is very much appropos here. The target for a router designer is moving.
Current thread:
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason, (continued)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Sean Donelan (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Ian Duncan (Nov 26)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Alex Bligh (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason jerry scharf (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Brett Frankenberger (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Ryan O'Connell (Nov 27)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Alex Bligh (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Paul Vixie (Nov 26)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Joel Jaeggli (Nov 29)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Vadim Antonov (Nov 29)