nanog mailing list archives
Re: win95 and IEAK6.0
From: Joshua Coombs <network-nanog () gwi net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:08:07 -0500
While it may be sooner than some would like, I've no qualms with Microsoft cutting off older versions of software. Just think how much smoother and stabler Win95 could have been if MS bit the bullet and dumped DOS/win 3.1 support? In any case, why do your customers HAVE to use the latest IEAK package to connect to your service? Is it not possible to keep older versions on hand for older systems? Joshua Coombs * jcoombs () gwi net - All opinions, statements and outright lies - contained within are copyright 2001 by - Joshua Coombs and shall not be reprinted - or publicly displayed without ignoring this - useless boilerplate. On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:51:32PM -0600, Bill Larson wrote:
However there is no reason other than trying to force people to upgrade to the newest Microsoft OS version to write this browser so that it would not support windows 95 as well. Many of the rural users I deal with have machines barely able to run Windows 95, and forget windows 98. If I tell my users they must upgrade their computers to use my service those users will simply find another internet service. Bill Larson Network Administrator Compu-Net Enterprises ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Winders" <twinders () SPC cc tx us> To: "Bill Larson" <blarson () compu net> Cc: <isp-tech () isp-tech com>; <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:45 PM Subject: Re: win95 and IEAK6.0-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The problem is that IE6 does not support Win95. You need a minimum of Win98 to install IE6... ********************************************** Tim Winders, MCSE, CNE, CCNA Associate Dean of Information Technology South Plains College Levelland, TX 79336 Phone: 806-894-9611 x 2369 FAX: 806-894-1549 Email: TWinders () SPC cc tx us ********************************************** On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Bill Larson wrote:It appears that without telling anyone Microsoft decided the Internet Explorer Admin Kit version 6.0 which generates a custom IE web browserforISP's would no longer support Windows 95. I do not know about the restofyou however, I have many Windows 95 users still signing on to myservice. Ithink it is time to let Microsoft know our displeasure about this clear abuse of their monopoly position. Once someone else confirms thisbehavior,I intend to raise a stink with the national news media, the federal government and the nine states that are still suing Microsoft. Bill Larson Network Administrator Compu-Net Enterprises ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Today on ISP-Planet Hot business, marketing & tech tips for the ISP community http://www.isp-planet.com/ _____________ The ISP-TECH Discussion List _____________ To Join: mailto:join-isp-tech () isp-tech com To Remove: mailto:remove-isp-tech () isp-tech com Archives: http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-tech/archives/-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (OSF1) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iEYEARECAAYFAjv8BEwACgkQTPuHnIooYbyi+QCgkL4b+a0aeEqPn8JgH8/EaSdd yhQAoJRakUsStK7qb5myQ7skwaYTnDNg =ZhP0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Paul Timmins (Nov 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 James Smith (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Matt Levine (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Joshua Coombs (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Patrick Muldoon (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Joshua Coombs (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Patrick Muldoon (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Dave Stewart (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Vivien M. (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Dave Stewart (Nov 21)