nanog mailing list archives
Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:01:12 -0000
--On Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:23 AM -0800 "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org> wrote:
No, you mean: the joy of a rapacious monopoly with a spineless regulator.
Oh Sean's rants are always soooooo much better than mine... Alex Bligh Personal Capacity
Current thread:
- BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean M. Doran (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Alex Bligh (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Terence (Nov 23)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Terence (Nov 23)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Alex Bligh (Nov 21)
- Message not available
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Rodney Thayer (Nov 21)
- Contact at pbi.net or sbcglobal.net ? Tim Stiles (Nov 22)