RE: Congestion peering C&W<->@home

["Daniel Golding" <dgolding () sockeye com>]

This is probably more of an issue on @home's end, than C&Ws. Due to their
current financial difficulties, @home has had to seriously slow down
upgrades to it's peering infrastructure.

I would not expect resolution of this, any time soon.

- Daniel GOlding


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> Seth M. Kusiak
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 7:19 PM
> To: German Martinez
> Cc: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: Congestion peering C&W<->@home
>
>
>
> Yes, I called CW support on this issue last week and I was told that they
> are aware of the issue and that their 2nd and 3rd level techs are
> on top of
> it. They could not give me an ETA but said that the issue has
> been going on
> for 2-3 months.
>
> ~Seth
>
> German Martinez writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > Have somebody notice some congestion between C&W and @home,
> >
> > > 12  acr2-loopback.NewYork.cw.net (206.24.194.62)  153 ms  128 ms  149 ms
> > > 13  * cable-and-wireless-peering.NewYork.cw.net
> (206.24.193.242)  346 ms
> > > 349 ms -------> peering congested.
> > > 14  c1-pos4-0.cmdnnj1.home.net (24.7.65.229)  353 ms  340 ms *
> >
> > Is the same congestion all the time, it doesn't matter what time of the
> > day.
> >
> > Any response, off/online will be highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thank you
> > German
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > * THE DILBERT FUTURE *
> > * Thriving on Stupidity in the 21st Century *
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > "Internet capacity will increase indefinitely
> > to keep up with the egos of the people using it"