nanog mailing list archives
Re: Traffic per Prefix Length
From: "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 13:52:51 -0600
There are many interesting pieces of data and there is plenty of data in the Internet to collect. ;-) might show how much work routers have to do in particular areas of the table (which, granted, varies from location to location) when doing longest-prefix match. what areas of the table are hit more than others. "sh ip cef traffic prefix" At 01:55 AM 5/4/2001 +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:09:24PM -0600, Paul G. Donner wrote: > > does anyone collect stats that would facilitate the derivation of > the number of packets forwarded per prefix length (per unit time) > in the routing table or per prefix length range? percentages would > work too. > Interesting ... Do you think that this will give you any useful information? I would be more interested in how far packets go. Not in networks terms but in real distance. Next would be to go further up the stack and see if there is a difference in protocols (i.e www compared to dns). -- Arnold
Current thread:
- Traffic per Prefix Length Paul G. Donner (May 03)
- Re: Traffic per Prefix Length Arnold Nipper (May 03)
- Re: Traffic per Prefix Length Paul G. Donner (May 04)
- RE: Traffic per Prefix Length David Schwartz (May 05)
- Re: Traffic per Prefix Length Bill Woodcock (May 05)
- Re: Traffic per Prefix Length Simon Leinen (May 22)
- Re: Traffic per Prefix Length Arnold Nipper (May 03)