nanog mailing list archives
Re: Email Parcel Post is Good!
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:20:54 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:13:18 -0400 From: "Cutler, James R" <james.cutler () eds com> Various people are alleged to have said things like:
[ snip ]
Business Response:
[ snip ] I rather like DJB's IM2000 initiative: http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html Why not send the header with some "magic authentication cookie" to the receiver, who may then yank the file from sender-side spool using HTTP or some other protocol that's more efficient than uu- or mime-encoded SMTP? Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com> To: blacklist () brics com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
Current thread:
- Email Parcel Post is Good! Cutler, James R (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! E.B. Dreger (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Andrew Brown (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Jim Mercer (May 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Owen DeLong (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Saint skullY the Dazed (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Jamie Norwood (May 25)
- RE: Email Parcel Post is Good! Roeland Meyer (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Andrew Brown (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Steve Sobol (May 26)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! Andrew Brown (May 25)
- RE: Email Parcel Post is Good! E.B. Dreger (May 25)
- Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! E.B. Dreger (May 25)