nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stealth Blocking
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:33:52 -0400
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:49:54PM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
Guys, there are more cases that may look like an open relay, but really aren't.
I don't see how you can have a false positive on an open relay test. Either it allows you to send a test email through, or it doesn't. If it does, it is by definition open. Unless you mistakenly test a site that considers you to be a customer and has specifically allowed relaying for you. But for somebody to do that for ORBS, say, would be like calling them up and leaving a voicemail saying "please block me, I dare you."
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: "Big Red", (continued)
- Re: "Big Red" Aaron (May 25)
- Re: "Big Red" Scott Francis (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Fraizer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Jason Slagle (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jason Slagle (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Jason Slagle (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Richard A. Steenbergen (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking J.D. Falk (May 26)
- Re: Stealth Blocking mike harrison (May 26)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking jlewis (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dan Hollis (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)