nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stealth Blocking
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:12:44 -0700
From: Eric A. Hall [mailto:ehall () ehsco com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:03 AMThe negative side effect is that it cripples people who use email as a file transfer protocol.Which I do, quite extensively. Transit providers shouldn't be doing this.I agree. Access providers should be, however.
That depends on your definition of access provider. I would be livid, were my upstream to do such traffic shaping on my feed. We would also be in court for breach of contract. I buy bandwidth and IP space. I expect to get what I pay for. I don't pay to have my traffic restricted by other than my pipe size.
Current thread:
- Re: Stealth Blocking, (continued)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Scott Francis (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Why are you all still here? (Was Re: Stealth Blocking) Adam Rothschild (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking J.D. Falk (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- "Big Red" Tim Langdell, PhD (May 24)
- Re: "Big Red" Mitch Halmu (May 24)
- Re: "Big Red" Aaron (May 25)
- Re: "Big Red" Scott Francis (May 25)
- "Big Red" Tim Langdell, PhD (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Fraizer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)