nanog mailing list archives
RE: terminal server recommendation
From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 21:28:12 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Martin, Christian wrote:
The Xylogics/Bay/Nortel Remote Annex 4000 can support up tp 72 console ports, and has a great menu interface with great EIA-232 functionality.
Eh? Unless they've added command completion and history, I have to disagree there... Add to that that they don't self-boot and that you can't save your config off the box. And you will *not* just set the thing up in a half hour.
Ports don't hang, they reset on time, etc. They use amphenol connectors across 25 pair which makes for easy punchdowns and cross-connects.
The amphenols have a nasty habit of not seating properly, especially when the box is in a cabinet and some cables have to go upwards rather than down... And when they're half-in, or not perfectly level you one day find you can reach four of your six devices... And there's no ssh.
One caveat - they are EOL....
Thank God :) But the code seems to have lived on for a while in the Bay 5300 access servers. I think only Concentric bought into that sham though. Some evil things just cannot be killed by normal means. Although a good "ping -s 1500" directed at an attached PPP user will render it useless until you stop. Perhaps it's because I'm still forced to use them since we have them left over from when they were dialup PPP servers or something, but I like them less than stinky cheese. I do get a bit nostalgic because it was the first thing I ever "su'd" on, and it does have a BSD code base. But I certainly would recommend anything else over an Annex. BTW, wanna buy one? I've got a spare 4000 and two Annex 3's, and a box full of octopus cable... MHO, Charles
chrisI would like to deploy a terminal server in several of my POPs, however cost is a slight issue. Can anyone on the list recommend a fairly inexpensive terminal server (besides Cisco)? Obviously the terminal server should be reliable and work - it is the little things that count. chas _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Current thread:
- Re: terminal server recommendation, (continued)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Andy Dills (May 01)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Paul Vixie (May 01)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Joe Lapolito (May 01)
- Re: terminal server recommendation just me. (May 01)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Joe Lapolito (May 01)
- Re: terminal server recommendation just me. (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Wolfgang Tremmel (May 02)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Shawn McMahon (May 02)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Shawn McMahon (May 02)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Roeland Meyer (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Martin, Christian (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Charles Sprickman (May 01)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Scott Gifford (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Charles Sprickman (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Martin, Christian (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation Martin, Christian (May 01)
- RE: terminal server recommendation John Fraizer (May 02)
- Re: terminal server recommendation Adrian Chadd (May 02)
- RE: terminal server recommendation John Fraizer (May 02)
- Re: terminal server recommendation SMcGrath (May 02)
- Re: terminal server recommendation SMcGrath (May 02)