nanog mailing list archives
Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks]
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 14:42:17 +0800
On Wed, May 09, 2001, Clayton Fiske wrote:
Nor should you have to learn how to patch and maintain a webserver to surf the web. But we're not talking about end users, we're talking about admins. Do admins -have- to learn English? No, but I don't think it's an unreasonable request when they will be operating a server in a network where it's the most common language spoken by their fellow admins, particularly when their machine is in a position to pose a security risk to others' machines and networks.
"fellow admins" ? What, the admins they: * hang out with in their city? * on irc? * in a newsgroup? * through IM type clients?
But I guess wanting to be able to deal with operational issues in a common language, whether it's English or not, makes me USA-centric...
no, that doesn't make you USA-centric. Wanting people to speak English because its the "standard language" .. what "standard language" ? Wanting people to speak English because the internet and computing in general was invented by Americans - well, guess we're all going to have to speak Chinese since they invented gunpowder. You want a globally-self-regulating internet, yet you want English to be the "standard language" ? A common language for internet operations would be a good thing. Now, how do you encourage people to learn and speak it? As a fun thought experiment - imagine for a moment how you'd feel if you had to learn Chinese (and you obviously didn't speak it!), but you couldn't move to Chinese. Everyone around you still speaks English (so you don't get the practice/exposure needed) but you get net-related emails in Chinese. Some of your software is written in Chinese, but all the modern stuff has an English option. Welcome to planet earth. please enjoy your stay. This is my last post on the topic. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "How could we possibly use sex to get <adrian () creative net au> what we want? Sex _IS_ what we want!" -- Fraser
Current thread:
- Re: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: black hat .cn networks Adrian Chadd (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks dklindt (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Scott Francis (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Jim Dixon (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Steve Sobol (May 09)
- Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] Clayton Fiske (May 09)
- RE: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] Deepak Jain (May 09)
- Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] Scott Francis (May 10)
- Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] Adrian Chadd (May 09)
- Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] David Diaz (May 10)
- Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] Clayton Fiske (May 10)
- Re: black hat .cn networks batz (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Michael C . Wu (May 11)
- foreign upstarts dare to use their own languages [was: Re: black hat .cn networks] Joe Abley (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (May 08)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Masataka Ohta (May 08)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (May 08)