nanog mailing list archives
RE: Instant chats and central servers
From: "ken harris." <ken () boii com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 23:15:43 -0400
ConferenceRoom (www.webmaster.com). The SSL implementation was good enoughfor some folks in Maryland.
it's good enough if you feel like dropping minimum half a grand for the windows version, or eight hundred for the unix flavor. oh and if you want the encryption module thats an extra thousand. but that can only be applied to the version that will run you five thousand dollars in the first place. for chat david? c'mon. not everyone is ted turner. especially when (last time i checked) most of the code was just the dalnet ircd (the old one mind you, not the one [bahamut] that jason referred to). stick to the free versions guys. chat shouldn't be that expensive.
DS
-ken harris.
Current thread:
- Instant chats and central servers Sean Donelan (May 08)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers Peter van Dijk (May 08)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers Christopher A. Woodfield (May 08)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers David Schwartz (May 08)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers ken harris. (May 08)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers David Schwartz (May 08)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers ken harris. (May 09)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers David Schwartz (May 09)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers ken harris. (May 09)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers David Schwartz (May 09)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers Christopher A. Woodfield (May 08)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers Peter van Dijk (May 08)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers ken harris. (May 08)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers Jason Slagle (May 08)
- RE: Instant chats and central servers Eric Pree (May 08)
- Re: Instant chats and central servers Scott Francis (May 08)