nanog mailing list archives
Re: HR 1542
From: Roy <garlic () garlic com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 10:22:00 -0700
The latest FCC rules prevent very much control over cable companies by the city. The city no longer has rate control nor can they attach provisions such as "open access". The cable company can't have a "monopoly" either but then again, neither can the ILEC. How many overbuilds are there? An insignificant few. One tactic would be for a city to declare eminent domain and take over all wiring (telco and cable) and run it absolutely open. I am not sure I really want to go there though. "Joseph T. Klein" wrote:
.... Most cable television franchises are regulated on the local level by municipalities. Each city created franchises based on the wish of the local city government. In some cites the cable company has a monopoly, some not. The cable contracts are from time to time up for review in some cities. If you have a problem with way cable is done in your town or city, then you should get involved in local politics.
...
Current thread:
- more on cable companies, (continued)
- more on cable companies RJ Atkinson (May 07)
- Re: more on cable companies Miles Fidelman (May 07)
- Re: more on cable companies Jeff Mcadams (May 07)
- Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Joe Rhett (May 07)
- Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Fletcher E Kittredge (May 07)
- Northern VA CATV systems RJ Atkinson (May 07)
- Re: Northern VA CATV systems Craig A. Haney (May 09)
- Re: Northern VA CATV systems RJ Atkinson (May 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Northern VA CATV systems RJ Atkinson (May 09)
- Re: HR 1542 Roy (May 07)
- Re: HR 1542 Steve Sobol (May 07)