nanog mailing list archives
RE: jumbo frames
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:58:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Lane Patterson wrote:
"Mid-jumbo": say 4470: the idea is to make sure a backbone can preserve its MTU across both ethernet, ATM, and POS links within its diameter, and conceivably between networks via IX's that support jumbos. This in fact may be critical for folks running large ISIS implementations that need to ration # of LSPs:
This is what I find most interesting. If we can just have GE support basically the same size as POS etc, then it becomes much more useful. Too bad ciscos 3GE card only supports 2450 MTU. The 1GE supports 9180 and the PA-GE supports 4470. Oh joy, pick a standard, glad there are so many to choose from. It seems more newer L2 GE-switch manufacutrers support jumbo (real jumbo, up to at least 8192, most of them even higher) than the older router manufacturers (or is it just cisco?). -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: jumbo frames Richard A. Steenbergen (May 30)
- Re: jumbo frames Dave Siegel (May 30)
- Re: jumbo frames Richard A. Steenbergen (May 30)
- Re: jumbo frames Wayne Bouchard (May 30)
- Re: jumbo frames Richard A. Steenbergen (May 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: jumbo frames Lane Patterson (May 31)
- RE: jumbo frames Mikael Abrahamsson (May 31)
- RE: jumbo frames RJ Atkinson (May 31)
- RE: jumbo frames Mikael Abrahamsson (May 31)
- RE: jumbo frames RJ Atkinson (May 31)
- Re: jumbo frames Dave Siegel (May 30)