![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: "Ukyo Kuonji" <kawaii_iinazuke () hotmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:52:14 -0500
How is TE part of QoS? Maybe we are talking a different type of TE. To me, TE is the part that the traffic takes, not really what queue it sits in to transmit.
I could see a arguement for QoS being part of TE, but... (Assuming that you TE your netword so there is no conjestion.)
---Opinions in this email are the personal opinions of the author and are not associated with author's employer. This email account is a not the regular email account of the author and is being used for the protection of the employer.
--- Original Message --- Everything that you said is correct. However, you missed one important part of QoS, which is TE. TE is about avoiding congestion in the first place by more efficiently using all of the bandwidth you already have in the network. To that extent, it is a substitute for adding more pipe. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Current thread:
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Rafi Sadowsky (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Nathan Stratton (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Randy Bush (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)