nanog mailing list archives
Re: Early warning system
From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat () liveonthenet com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:10:28 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Kevin Oberman wrote:
A mailing list per block seems a good idea. That way customers could subscribe to the list(s) in which they have equipment. The problem is that PG&E has been shutting down PORTIONS of a block. The next shutdown will be "within block 14". So a notification that block 14 is going down would only mean that your power MIGHT be going out. :-(
Or simply a smarter mailing list which applies additional selection criteria to the mailings. That might include block number, whether they have interruptible contract, etc. John A. Tamplin jat () jaet org 770/436-5387 HOME 4116 Manson Ave 770/431-9459 FAX Smyrna, GA 30082-3723
Current thread:
- Early warning system Sean Donelan (Mar 21)
- Re: Early warning system Eric A. Hall (Mar 21)
- Re: Early warning system Lionel Lauer (Mar 21)
- Re: Early warning system Kevin Oberman (Mar 22)
- Re: Early warning system John A. Tamplin (Mar 22)
- Re: Early warning system Lloyd Taylor (Mar 22)
- Re: Early warning system Eric A. Hall (Mar 21)
- Re: Early warning system Jeffrey Haas (Mar 22)
- Re: Early warning system David Lesher (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Early warning system Sean Donelan (Mar 22)
- Re: Early warning system Josh Richards (Mar 22)