nanog mailing list archives
RE: AOL holes again.
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 02:15:07 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, David Schwartz wrote:
Note that service observing and random monitoring are permitted only for quality control checks. If headers are analyzed to slap up automatic filters when suspicious patterns are detected, it may be necessary to defend this practice as a "mechanical or service quality control check". This may be more difficult than you would expect.
Unless you put this control in the hands of the recipient -- let the end user decide what they want to filter. Poof. End of debate. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: AOL holes again., (continued)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Dan Hollis (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- RE: AOL holes again. jlewis (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Alan Clegg (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. James M. Shuler III (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Wayne (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- RE: AOL holes again. David Schwartz (Mar 21)
- RE: AOL holes again. Dan Hollis (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Matt Levine (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steve Sobol (Mar 21)