nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:03:52 +0200
At 11:46 20/03/01 +0200, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:My email on Feb 1 to as1221 () telstra net, David.Woodgate () telstra net, paull () telstra net, gih () telstra net has gone unanswered. Even a reply of "we don't care or we have our reasons" would have been better than no answer at all.
-Hank
Hello, Quote from "The Cidr Report": } ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description } AS1221 1594 1194 400 25.1% Telstra Pty Ltd } AS226 149 93 56 37.6% Los Nettos Seeing the same few big providers in the report each week is of course disheartening, but seeing these two stay on the list is in my opinion even worse through disillusionment. Telstra because they themselves give the impression of caring about the global routing table size by maintaining the graph of its growth over the years. And Los Nettos / ISI because they give the impression of being a sort of authority on networking know-how by associating themselves with several related services and projects. -- Aleksi Suhonen
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Mar 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Simon Leinen (Mar 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: [apops] The Cidr Report Mark Prior (Mar 11)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Mar 16)
- The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report Aleksi Suhonen (Mar 20)
- Re: The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report Aleksi Suhonen (Mar 20)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Mar 23)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Mar 30)