RE: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?

[Travis Pugh <tpugh () shore net>]

That may be a little extreme ... I generally get good support from all of
my upstreams.  However, there's a certain amount of static to be expected
when you start raising inter-provider issues, especially when all the
latency seems be caused by the provider you aren't a customer of.

-travis

On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Tom Thomas wrote:

> Bad attitudes to a customer are a clear indication you should take your
> money elsewhere.
>
> Personally I like NetRail, they are courteous and responsive.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> Travis Pugh
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:13 PM
> To: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
>
>
>
>
> Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going
> on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast?  We've been seeing this kind
> of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's
> problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're
> not an ATT customer.
>
> UUNet --> ATT
>
>  6  POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.97)  9.212 ms  9.633 ms  10.363
> ms
>  7  137.39.52.74 (137.39.52.74)  9.642 ms  12.967 ms  12.137 ms
>  8  gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.122)  418.555 ms  416.419 ms
> 419.819 ms
>
> ATT --> UUNet
>
>   8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.253) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec
> 20 msec
>   9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (192.205.32.130) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392
> msec
>  10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.82.190) [AS 701] 388 msec 388
> msec 388 msec
>
> Thanks.
>
> -travis