nanog mailing list archives
Re: new.net
From: Jim Dixon <jdd () vbc net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 22:11:35 +0000 (GMT)
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001 richb () pioneer ci net wrote:
Corporate entities should be *required* to register in the flat dot-com namespace, IMHO, and not be *allowed* names in any other namespace.
First I'll remind you that there is a world outside of the United States. Then I'll ask: are you at all serious? You expect to ban UK companies from registering in .co.uk? Precisely how would you enforce this ban? -- Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd http://www.vbc.net tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015
Current thread:
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Jim Dixon (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Jim Dixon (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Simon Lockhart (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 10)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Jim Dixon (Mar 08)