nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
From: Andrea Abrahamsen <slinky () home com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 15:31:25 -0800
I'm going to start a company and introduce a new TLD. .sucks. I wonder what ICANN would have to say about that. :) At 13:18 03/07/01, you wrote: Which brings me to the interesting borderline case: companyname.sucks.com Can WIPO take away hostname records?:) Pi
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Andrea Abrahamsen (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steven J. Sobol (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Vadim Antonov (Mar 07)
- Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) Joshua Goodall (Mar 08)
- Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) Scott Gifford (Mar 08)
- Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) bob bownes (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Vadim Antonov (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steven J. Sobol (Mar 07)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Ben Browning (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Vadim Antonov (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steve Sobol (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play David Charlap (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)