Re: Next NANOG (really off topic)

["Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () clark net>]

> On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> >  One thing which I would find useful is connectivity which extends into the
> >  hotel rooms themselves. Wireless would be nice, but most hotels don't cope
> >  with this very well. One conference I went to (I can't remember if it was
> >  NANOG or USENIX) provided dial-in on a hotel extension, which was useful!
>
> The hotel of the future, giving you 10/100 switched ethernet to the room
> (a hub at extra charge), and the hotel then gets an uplink to X NSP, based
> on number of rooms and average usage.
>
> Along with that comes online gaming among hotel guests (you can have a PC
> installed - laptop for the suites - for extra charge), with online games
> installed, where hotel guests connect to a hotel gaming server (quake
> server for example), and play among themselves.

If the quake server is a requirement, does that specifically include 
or exclude Seattle?

> Of course, downstairs in the game rooms, there will be also computers who
> can be used for the el-cheapo guests, if they can't afford one in the
> room, in order to play (price/time of usage).
>
> ....
>
> --Ariel
>
>  >
\