Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)

[Paul Vixie <vixie () mfnx net>]

Following up on my own post:

vixie () mfnx net (Paul Vixie) writes:

> Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like:
> ...

Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc)
and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at
this stage of the game.

This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is
not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read
NANOG.

This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.