nanog mailing list archives
Re: Opinions about InterNAP
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () freedman net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:00:11 -0400
In article <101513.154547.12017 () avi netaxs com> you wrote: : Filters depend on where you get your allocation. We got 216.249.16.0/20 : from arin. Since we're above the swamp, we have a greater chance of : having any given /24 not be filtered. Shortly after we got the : allocation, I announced a single /24, and could cleanly traceroute to : machines on that subnet from points behind sprint, verio, C&W, worldcom, : etc. Had we been given an allocation from 65/8 or another block in : former-class-A space, we probably would've had problems. You'd have to announce the /24 on a separate link and make sure traffic came back to it. Or, stop announcing the /20. Hope this isn't insulting, just make sure the test is good :) : -j Avi
Current thread:
- Opinions about InterNAP Seth M. Kusiak (Jun 13)
- Re: Opinions about InterNAP Jonathan Disher (Jun 13)
- Prefix-legth FUD (was: Re: Opinions about InterNAP) Tony Tauber (Jun 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Opinions about InterNAP Avi Freedman (Jun 18)