nanog mailing list archives
Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses
From: Joshua Goodall <joshua () roughtrade net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 05:50:39 +0100 (BST)
charles, what I was actually trying to convey was that the published policies are what you have to deal with, not the RFC, and that in particular, some RIR policies have diverged from 2050. I have never been employed by an RIR. I simply know/knew enough people on the inside of one particular RIR to know how things worked in practice. this may be of interest: http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/registration/rir-comp-matrix-rev.html and I suggest you don't publicly flame private emails in future. J
Current thread:
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Charles Scott (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Charles Scott (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses David R Huberman (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Charles Scott (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses David R Huberman (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Charles Scott (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses David R Huberman (Jun 16)
- RE: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Richard Jimmerson (Jun 18)
- RE: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Charles Scott (Jun 18)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Joshua Goodall (Jun 16)
- Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses Charles Scott (Jun 17)