nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 11 Jun 2001 00:43:19 -0700
Folks have given a number of interesting multimedia applications using multicast, but I'm not sure any of them really need multicast. Akamia/iBeam/Skycache, or any other set of large memory buffer boxes around the network edge, seem to be a much better way to replicate multimedia streams, and even provide the popular VCR start/pause/stop effect. This works well for single sourced (or limited source) multimedia streams that have very little interaction with the recipient (aka TV for the Internet). Multicast seems to be more efficient for updating large buffer edge boxes than delivering the content directly to the end-user.
Current thread:
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones, (continued)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Brandon Ross (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Sean Donelan (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Eric A. Hall (Jun 10)
- RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Michael Whisenant (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones BrandonButterworth (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Eric A. Hall (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Hank Nussbacher (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Sean Donelan (Jun 11)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Robert Beverly (Jun 11)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Thomas R. Charron (Jun 14)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 14)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones John Fraizer (Jun 14)
- RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Thomas R. Charron (Jun 14)