nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:18:06 -0700
o ipv6, mpls, and diffserve-enabled backbones will solve all your problemsThink you missed making sure you cook this lot up on top of ATM SVCs
i was using atm-2, not atm-1. in the modern age, they're called lsps not svs. i think all my competitors should deploy these technologies. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones, (continued)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Joshua Goodall (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Michael Whisenant (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Eric Gauthier (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Michael Whisenant (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Michael Whisenant (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Alex Bligh (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Austin Schutz (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Austin Schutz (Jun 11)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 11)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Michael Whisenant (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)
- Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones Tim Winders (Jun 10)