nanog mailing list archives
Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:08:46 -0700
So I guess the right answer here is that everyone needs to learn how to use attenuators propperly... On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 05:45:21PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
I am thinking about using different POS interfaces on dark-fibers. On one side, i already have POS-OC48-LR card (Cisco). This card use 1550 nm wave length. We would like to use a POS-OC48-SR (Cisco). This card use 1310 nm wave length. Are 1310 and 1550 optics comptatible ?You have to have the same wavelength at both ends, otherwise it won't work.If yes, i guess that there is impact on the power Budget available. How-Much ?!LR tends to be 1550nm, because 1550nm has less signal loss over the same length of fiber. Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676 Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart () bbc co uk Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/
Current thread:
- POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Vincent Gillet (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Simon Lockhart (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Wayne Bouchard (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length John Fraizer (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 08)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Steve Schaefer (Jun 08)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Wayne Bouchard (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Simon Lockhart (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Steve Feldman (Jun 07)
- Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length Steve Schaefer (Jun 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: POS OC48 interfaces using different wave length pasi . vaananen (Jun 07)