nanog mailing list archives
RE: C&W Perring
From: "Scott Patterson" <scottp () netrail net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:08:04 -0400
MessageI would guess it is PSI. They are trying to see exactly how much traffic they can force to other networks by pre-pending and probably (I don't know how their routing is setup) setting lpref on the c&w sessions to their lowest possible. Then they will know what traffic is only available through c&w. Then they will prob see how many of these people they can peer directly with or sell services to during the 60 day continuation. Scott -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of David Sinn Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:57 PM To: Nanog Subject: RE: C&W Perring So which side is doing the pre-pending? Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * 12.10.44.0/23 166.49.26.73 50 100 0 3561 174 174 174 174 4550 11937 i David -----Original Message----- From: Moe Allen [mailto:moe () vidnet net] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:33 AM To: Nanog Subject: C&W Perring To all: I just got off the phone with Cable & Wireless. A 60 day continuation of peering with PSINET was reached last night. The peering is back up and we can now find PSINET DNS server again. More on this as I am made aware. Respectfully, Morris Allen President VidcomNet, Inc.
Current thread:
- C&W Perring Moe Allen (Jun 06)
- Re: C&W Perring Andrew C. Ohnstad (Jun 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: C&W Perring David Sinn (Jun 06)
- RE: C&W Perring Scott Patterson (Jun 06)
- Re: C&W Perring Moe Allen (Jun 06)