nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 18:16:32 -0400
At 05:44 PM 6/4/2001 -0400, Travis Pugh wrote: >route-views.oregon-ix.net concurs: > >route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp regex ^3561_174_ > >route-views.oregon-ix.net>Yes, but if one or the other has backup peering, it would not look like that. It would look like _3561_.*_174_ or _174_.*_3561_ - prolly the former since AS3561 gives route-views a feed, but AS714 does not.
Looking in route-views for those two patterns, I see only a few routes under 3561.*_174_, probably leakage. There are no routes of the form _174_.*_3561_.
Since route-views does have a feed from AS3561, I would say it is official. Cable and Wireless cannot reach PSI.net.
Congratulations ladies & gentlemen. The first intentional, prolonged, significant (for some values of "significant" :) outage on the Internet. And we were all here to see it....
Wow, in the same week MAE-East dies. Sad time for the 'Net. :(( >-travis -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 06)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: C&W Peering Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Simon Lockhart (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Chris Adams (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Eric A. Hall (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering David Schwartz (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering ken harris. (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Mike Hughes (Jun 04)