nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile = Lame]
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:36:19 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:23:45 -0400 From: Henry Yen <henry () AegisInfoSys com> To: nanog () merit edu Subject: OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile = Lame]
[ snip ]
in nassau/suffolk in new york (aka long island), the local power company is setting up a program whereby your central air conditioning system gets connected, via the internet (!!), and you get a small $$ bonus in return for allowing them to shut off your a/c unit during peak usage times. the box and hookup are free, as well as software to allow you to control your own unit over the 'net.
Once upon a time there was a similar program in Wichita, except they shut your AC down via wireless. Called the power company to see about moving the box when switching from siding to stone a few years ago, and they said that they quit doing the remote shutdown. Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com> To: blacklist () brics com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
Current thread:
- Re: 95th Percentile != Lame, (continued)
- Re: 95th Percentile != Lame James Thomason (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile != Lame David Klindt (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile != Lame Paul Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile != Lame James Thomason (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame David Schwartz (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile = Lame Alexei Roudnev (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame James Thomason (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame Greg A. Woods (Jun 03)
- OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile = Lame] Henry Yen (Jun 04)
- Re: OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile = Lame] scott w (Jun 04)
- Re: OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile = Lame] E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: 95th Percentile = Lame Alexei Roudnev (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile = Lame Charles Scott (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile = Lame James Thomason (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame David Schwartz (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame James Thomason (Jun 03)
- Measuring traffic (WAS: 95th Percentile = Lame) Charles Scott (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 02)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Geoff Huston (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Nipper, Arnold (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)