nanog mailing list archives
Re: 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..'
From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme () 21rst-century com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:06:32 -0400
This is, in fact, what we do; it still makes me nervous. Marshall
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Marshall Eubanks wrote:How many of us here run anything less than SSH and even allow telnetd
tolive on any of our hosts?Hey, we have had to do without SSH in more than one CISCO IOS build in the
last
6 months in 12.1 / 12.2. This always made me feel very nervous.One way of avoiding this is to always have a console server that has SSH implemented into the IOS build ( or even a separate vendor that supports SSH ). This way you centrally access your network devices from
one spot, authenticated by SSH, if any of the devices in question do not support SSH ( yes this can be impractical, but I typically want to have console access to every device I administer if possible anyway ). .z
Marshall Eubanks tme () 21rst-century com
Current thread:
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..'), (continued)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Joe Shaw (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Joe Shaw (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Ryan Tucker (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with theextent to which luck..') Chris Rapier (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with theextent to which luck..') Owen DeLong (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Jonas Luster (Jul 25)
- Re: 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..' z (Jul 25)
- Re: 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..' Christopher A. Woodfield (Jul 25)