nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution
From: Me <smentzer () mentzer org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:30:16 -0600 (MDT)
perhaps you have uncovered a bug or something then, as I have never seen a cisco do that... -- -sean Spoon! On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 alex () yuriev com wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:31:15 -0400 (EDT) From: alex () yuriev com To: Dave Israel <davei () biohazard demon digex net> Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistributionAlex, Make sure you don't have "auto-summary" turned on. Auto-summary is always classful, and therefore nearly always evil.We never do auto-summary Thanks, Alex-Dave On 7/13/2001 at 16:20:40 -0400, alex () yuriev com said:Hello, Can anyone shed some light on why cisco ignores "ip classless" when redistributing classless connected routes into bgp, making things such as /30 into /24s? Thanks, Alex-- Dave Israel Senior Manager, IP Backbone Intermedia Business Internet
Current thread:
- Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution alex (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Dave Israel (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution alex (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Me (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution alex (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Bill Woodcock (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Vijay Gill (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Dave Israel (Jul 13)