nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco RFC1997 implementation clarification.


From: Marko Karppinen <marko.karppinen () magentasites com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:02:36 +0300


While researching an RFC1997 issue this morning, I made the following
observations:

CISCO no-export = RFC1997 NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED
CISCO local-as = RFC1997 NO_EXPORT

Cisco Press' Routing TCP/IP, Vol 2 explicitly states that
LOCAL_AS == NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED. It's description of LOCAL_AS differs,
however, from the one you quoted from a Cisco web page:

"LOCAL_AS (4294967043, or 0xFFFFFF03) -- RFC 1997 calls this attribute
NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED. Routes received carrying this value cannot be
advertised to EBGP peers, including peers in other autonomous systems within
a confederation."

My money is on the Cisco web page you quoted being wrong.

Marko

--
Magenta Sites
   Marko Karppinen


Current thread: