nanog mailing list archives

Re: It's way too quiet


From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:22:41 -0400


Im wondering if that's why so many of the ILEC's DSL offerings are 128K 
upstream - do they have anything to gain by having residential DSL service 
not classifed by the FCC as a broadband service?

-C

In January 1999, the FCC defined broadband as a
connection to an
end-user with speeds greater than 200 kbps in both
directions.

-Vince


On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Larry Diffey wrote:

Since it's so quiet in here, I want to stir things
up a little with an informal survey.

With all of this talk about broadband (mostly in
reference to cable modems and xDSL), consumers have
been tricked into actually believing that if it's
faster than a modem then it's broadband.

I have a number in my head as to what I consider
broadband.  It's not an unreasonable number but it
certainly does exceed what is available to the average
consumer.

Oh wise nanogers, what speeds do we need to achieve
for the average consumer before we truly have
broadband?

I will try and keep track of all the numbers that
you give you an average and I'll also give you the
number I had in mind.


Regards,

Larry Diffey

**Incidentally, I am at this very moment wearing a
t-shirt that says "Will work for bandwidth".



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

-- 
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield                rekoil () semihuman com

PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B


Current thread: