nanog mailing list archives
Re: It's way too quiet
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:22:41 -0400
Im wondering if that's why so many of the ILEC's DSL offerings are 128K upstream - do they have anything to gain by having residential DSL service not classifed by the FCC as a broadband service? -C
In January 1999, the FCC defined broadband as a connection to an end-user with speeds greater than 200 kbps in both directions. -Vince On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Larry Diffey wrote:Since it's so quiet in here, I want to stir thingsup a little with an informal survey.With all of this talk about broadband (mostly inreference to cable modems and xDSL), consumers have been tricked into actually believing that if it's faster than a modem then it's broadband.I have a number in my head as to what I considerbroadband. It's not an unreasonable number but it certainly does exceed what is available to the average consumer.Oh wise nanogers, what speeds do we need to achievefor the average consumer before we truly have broadband?I will try and keep track of all the numbers thatyou give you an average and I'll also give you the number I had in mind.Regards, Larry Diffey **Incidentally, I am at this very moment wearing at-shirt that says "Will work for bandwidth".__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-- --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil () semihuman com PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
Current thread:
- It's way too quiet Larry Diffey (Jul 05)
- Re: It's way too quiet Vincent Power (Jul 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: It's way too quiet Robert Cannon (Jul 05)
- Re: It's way too quiet Christopher A. Woodfield (Jul 05)
- Re: It's way too quiet Miles Fidelman (Jul 05)