nanog mailing list archives
Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () clark net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 23:14:05 -0500
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Simon Lockhart wrote:Indeed. We currently monitor each part of our operation from a monitoring station on our network. Under certain conditions, this can give us both false positives and false negatives:Umm... Keynote? (http://www.keynote.com) I find it truly amazing that people don't already diversely monitor. Hell, have cronned pings running off your friend's cable modem if that's all you can afford, but for christ's sake, a single box colo'd in someone else's cage, or a shell at shells.com or nether.net really isn't that expensive. Fighting the war against bad networks, Matthew Devney Teamsphere Interactive
Might be interesting to define a set of basic monitoring functions that independent ISPs can run on each other and share results. Early warnings could go to a special email. _________________________________FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to abuse () groupstudy com
Current thread:
- Monitoring highly redundant operations Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations poptix (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Henry Yen (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Henry Yen (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 24)
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 24)