nanog mailing list archives
Re: m$ blames icann
From: <poptix () sleepybox poptix net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:03:54 -0600 (CST)
Yup, must be ICANN --- 207.46.138.12 ping statistics --- 34 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 41% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 55.7/57.8/63.9 ms traceroute to 207.46.138.12 (207.46.138.12), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 63.164.65.1 3.500 ms 4.095 ms 4.470 ms 2 160.81.42.213 17.969 ms 16.935 ms 17.421 ms 3 144.232.26.230 16.244 ms 15.732 ms 15.264 ms 4 144.232.18.49 52.954 ms 51.891 ms 53.010 ms 5 144.232.6.89 52.662 ms 53.057 ms 53.093 ms 6 144.232.187.230 52.917 ms 52.812 ms 52.695 ms 7 207.46.129.13 71.058 ms 69.305 ms 62.466 ms 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * It's amazing how MSFT's spokespeople can be so a) stupid, b) misinformed, or c) blatant liars. On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/computing/01/24/microsoft.blackout.idg/index.html Oh no, can't possibly be our own servers... -Dan
Current thread:
- m$ blames icann Dan Hollis (Feb 24)
- Re: m$ blames icann poptix (Feb 24)
- Re: m$ blames icann Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: m$ blames icann Chris Yarnell (Feb 24)