nanog mailing list archives
Re: nobody @home
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:18:07 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Basil Kruglov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Jim Mercer wrote:i've always found the list at http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.cgi to be most helpful, including reaching noc@home.Only when it comes to routing issues/problems, not security - "[d]DoS-in-progress" issues. :| 90% of those "NOCs" are help desk phone numbers, and it takes at least good 30-60min+ to get to the real NOC/people, if ever.
Youre lucky. Ive noticed an increasing trend that the NOC phone numbers listed on corporate web pages come back as disconnected/RNA, and the emails bounce "no such user". Real cute, especially when you're being ddos'd. whois data is even worse. I suspect upwards of 25% of whois contact data is worthless. -Dan
Current thread:
- Cisco PIX deen (Feb 24)
- Re: Cisco PIX Dave McKay (Feb 24)
- Re: Cisco PIX abt (Feb 24)
- nobody @home Philippe Landau (Feb 24)
- Re: nobody @home Jim Mercer (Feb 24)
- Re: nobody @home Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
- Re: nobody @home Dan Hollis (Feb 24)
- Re: Cisco PIX abt (Feb 24)
- Re: nobody @home Daniel L. Golding (Feb 24)
- [A little OT] Re: nobody @home Jon Stanley (Feb 24)
- Re: Cisco PIX Dave McKay (Feb 24)