![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: DOJ guidelines for electronic surveillance and search & seizure
From: "Mark Radabaugh" <mark () amplex net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:08:11 -0500
Interesting reading. The part on what you can disclose and when based on the type of Subpoena is interesting (and not what I had thought). I see a big problem with the distinction between unread mail in POP (or IMAP) accounts and read mail. With POP mail we have no way of knowing (at least not at our current log level) if a customer has actually checked e-mail and simply left it on the server or not. The law treats unread and read mail differently and requires different orders to disclose it. The usual -- INAL Mark Radabaugh VP, Amplex (419)833-3635 mark () amplex net
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Chip Sharp Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:36 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: DOJ guidelines for electronic surveillance and search & seizure http://www.cybercrime.gov/searchmanual.htm DOJ has released its new guidelines on search & seizure and electronic surveillance. It includes new material on the Internet and Internet service providers.
Current thread:
- DOJ guidelines for electronic surveillance and search & seizure Chip Sharp (Feb 24)
- RE: DOJ guidelines for electronic surveillance and search & seizure Mark Radabaugh (Feb 24)