RE: IPSectarianism

["Steve Riley (MCS)" <steriley () microsoft com>]

A while back, Cox @Home made it very clear that the use of VPN protocols is
prohibited. AT&T @Home (my provider) hasn't made any similar statements, so
I think it's more of a policy issue for the various cable companies than it
is for @Home themselves.

Of course, there's always httptunnel. Stick your IPSec/PPTP/L2TP traffic
inside good old http and you'll get anywhere you need to go...

_______________________________________________________
Steve Riley
Microsoft Communications Consulting in Denver, Colorado
    steriley () microsoft com
    +1 303 521-4129 (OLD mobile)
    www.microsoft.com/isn/
Applying computer technology is simply finding the right wrench to pound in
the correct screw.



-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Wardle, Critical Networks, Inc.
[mailto:dave () criticalnets com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 7:49 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: IPSectarianism



Back in November 2000 I read with interest a thread discussing the
implications of Service Providers blocking particular protocols (I believe
it was "Operational impact of blocking SMB/Netbios"). I recall one response
which explicitly stated that IPsec was not blocked. 

Is anyone on the list aware of Service Providers (ISP/NSP...) who DO block
IPsec traffic, with or without informing their customers or peers?

I'm trying to assess the pros and cons of major Enterprise Customers basing
their entire remote office/small office/mobile network access strategy on
some type of IPsec based VPN solution.

Any thoughts?

Cheers
Dave

-------
Dave Wardle, Principal Consultant 
Critical Networks, Inc.
-------
Email:    dave () criticalnets com
Homepage: www.criticalnets.com
-------
Cell:     831 332 1021
Tel:      831 662 1710
Fax:      831 662 1710
-------