nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Tony Bates <tbates () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:08:11 -0800
Seems something has broken in report as you suspected. Debugging now as to what has changed. Thanks, --Tony At 08:18 PM 1/12/2001 +0000, Alex Bligh wrote:
Tony, Either the internet has just got a lot better, or something is up with your report; I suspect the latter (worse luck). > 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level > > This lists the "Top 30" players who if they decided to aggregate > their announced classful prefixes at the origin AS level could .... > 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level > > --- 12Jan01 --- > ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description > > AS10501 2 1 1 50.0% PacLink > AS10390 2 1 1 50.0% TELECHECK -- Alex Bligh VP Core Network, XO Communications - http://www.xo.com/ (formerly Nextlink Inc, Concentric Network Corporation GX Networks, Xara Networks)
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Feb 24)
- Re: The Cidr Report Alex Bligh (Feb 24)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Feb 24)
- Re: The Cidr Report Alex Bligh (Feb 24)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Feb 24)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Feb 24)