nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange


From: "Martin Taylor" <marty_taylor () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 03:31:35 -0500


Lane,

    What about on Cisco's tweaking the global command "ip tcp synwait-time
X" so you don't have to wait so long for BGP to notice that the TCP session
no longer exists, there is probably a parallel command on Junos.  I haven't
tried it on BGP, but I would think that it would make BGP (and any other
protocol that relies on TCP sessions) much more sensitive.

marty

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Lane Patterson
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 1:08 AM
To: 'nanog () merit edu'
Subject: FW: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange

I am looking for operational BCP feedback on common practice for tweaking
down BGP holdtime/keepalive across GigE exchange points, since a peer
could go down on the other side of the GigE switch without a
corresponding adjacency change seen on your BR.  The thought is
to make down peers known as fast thru a GigE exchange as they would
be over a POS private peer interface.

The current defaults are pretty gross, and much worse than the
ISIS hello and interface keepalive defaults of 10 seconds.

IOS12.x: neighbor [ip-address | peer-group-name] timers keepalive holdtime
holdtime: default 180 seconds
keepalive: default 60 seconds


http://cco.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r
/iprprt2/1rdbgp.htm#xtocid8553

JunOS 4.2:
holdtime: default 90 seconds
keepalive: default one third of holdtime


https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos42/swconfig-routing42/html/bg
p-summary13.html#1015669

Cheers,
-Lane

Lane Patterson <lane () equinix com>
Equinix, Inc.



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Current thread: