nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 03:32:13 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Dana Hudes wrote:
why are you arguing over it? Haven't we had this discussion 3 or 4 times in the last 3 years?
DOn't you mean 3 or four times in the last 6 months? I would like to say that it is because we have more people in charge of routing policy for the new ASNs being assigned chiming in wanting advice. The truth of the matter is that even some of the GrayBeards on the list refuse to yield to common sense, RFCs or not and that 90% of the applicants for ASNs have no clue what NANOG is. Too bad. I know that NANOG has been an invaluable source for me. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Hawkinson (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Hawkinson (Feb 24)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Feb 24)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Sprunk (Feb 24)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Deron J. Ringen (Feb 24)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Griffin (Feb 24)