nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET peering policy
From: smd () clock org
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 18:50:53 -0800
Rodney Joffe is being optimistic; the fact is that a network that exceeds the minimum requirements UUNET has published yet which has zero customers, is simply not going to get a no-settlement peering agreement with UUNET. "Zero" here is a relative term. Sean. | >If I understand the document correctly, anyone who meets their clear | >requirements will be able to exchange traffic with them at no charge. [...] | >Rodney Joffe | >CenterGate Research Group, LLC.
Current thread:
- Re: UUNET peering policy, (continued)
- Re: UUNET peering policy John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policyy Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help Brian W. (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jlewis (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jeremiah (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jeff . Hodges (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Brian W. (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy john heasley (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy dave o'leary (Feb 24)