nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () mfnx net>
Date: 03 Feb 2001 13:54:20 -0800
meltzer () villageworld com (Jeffrey Meltzer) writes:
I'm confused. I get the TLD server operators part. But you're saying that you'd only give OS vendors access to this information. How long does it take, say, Sun, to issue a patch update? Wouldn't it be much more efficient, and useful, to issue the information directly to the people using the software? How many people actually use the default vendor binaries anyways?
CERT handles notification. The bind-members forum is for people who receive such notifications to coordinate with ISC on actual patch details. Check your paranoia at the door.
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Bill Fumerola (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Carter, Gregory (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Karyn Ulriksen (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Simon Waters (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- BIND, djbdns, commercialization jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- genetic diversity w/ DNS bmanning (Feb 24)
- Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS ken harris. (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)