nanog mailing list archives
Re: Next NANOG
From: Suzanne Woolf <woolf () ISI EDU>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:40:14 -0800
That brings up an interesting question. Is it desirable to have a larger group? I don't have a simple answer to this, but it's harder and harder to get good interaction with a large group.
It's already hard-- anyone nervous of mikes (yeah there are a few in this crowd) or just sitting far enough away from the aisles doesn't speak up. More people makes both problems worse.
Well, we run into a problem there... NANOG meetings have, as much as informative, been kind of a social event for those attending and I think that this has become a very large reason many people come. With a large group, that somewhat tends to go away.
Actually, what happens in large groups is that they splinter. You still see your friends, but it's harder to meet new people outside your company or your special area of interest. This is certainly an issue for IETF for example, and seemed to be a factor at the one or two big USENIX events I've been to.
The next answer for space is an arm of a convention center. And frankly, thats just not what I want to see happen to this thing.
Probably not, although small convention centers aren't necessarily more hassle or less friendly than big hotels. Lack of a bar would be a big problem though :). IETF in Pittsburgh last summer and other similar venues-- convention center for meeting space, attached hotel for bars and wireless-enabled common areas-- seemed to work OK.
I would be in favor of Vegas.. its a reasonably convenient place with good airport access. Of course, I think this is as much up to the sponsor (if any has been found) as anyone.
How about New Orleans? No, wait, not in the summertime.... It's an oft-overlooked attribute of the location problem that a willing sponsor is absolutely required and can be hard to find. The expense and the hassle factor are not trivial, although to some degree they can be traded off against each other, and the logistical requirements (transit bandwidth, wireless coverage, a/v) have been growing faster than the head count. Anyone who wants to dump on either Merit or local hosts about logistics should probably start their comments by volunteering to host themselves....or even just show up early and provide help. Kids, do *not* try this at home, at least not without plenty of bodies, patience, gear, and Tums.
Current thread:
- Next NANOG Pete Kruckenberg (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Aviva Garrett (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Dee McKinney (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Joel Jaeggli (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Rodney Caston (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Christian Nielsen (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Wayne Bouchard (Feb 26)
- Re: Next NANOG Suzanne Woolf (Feb 27)
- Re: Next NANOG Bora Akyol (Feb 27)
- Re: Next NANOG Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- Re: Next NANOG Joel Jaeggli (Feb 27)
- Re: Next NANOG Bora Akyol (Feb 27)
- Re: Next NANOG Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- Re: Next NANOG Alex Rubenstein (Feb 28)
- Re: Next NANOG Lucy E. Lynch (Feb 28)
- Re: Next NANOG Joe Abley (Feb 28)
- Re: Next NANOG Joel Jaeggli (Feb 28)
- Re: Next NANOG Alex (Feb 28)
- Re: Next NANOG Rodney Caston (Feb 26)