nanog mailing list archives
Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:52:53 -0500
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 09:02:46PM -0800, Ben Browning wrote:
The only possible reason you could want names, or account names, or addresses, or copies of my logs, etc would be to initiate civil or criminal proceedings, in which case the subpoena should be a piece of cake.
Wow; despite the lengthy discussion in which I've posted at least two messages talking about another possible reason, you've gotten this far in the thread without realizing there was more than one possible reason? This reminds me of the old joke about how you tell something to a blonde with two black eyes. I've already tried to tell you twice, a third time would just waste my time and annoy the pig.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Update for noc .nl problem.. Scott Walker (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. CARL P HIRSCH (Feb 24)
- Re: Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Scott Walker (Feb 24)
- Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Scott Walker (Feb 24)
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Shawn McMahon (Feb 26)
- Re: Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. John Fraizer (Feb 24)